• J3-Cub.com is the largest community of J3-Cub pilots, owners and enthusiasts. With over 1000 active members, we have fostered a vibrant community and extensive knowledge base. J3-Cub.com hosts a library of over 13 years of technical discussions, J3 data, tutorials, plane builds, guides, technical manuals and more. J3-Cub.com also hosts an extensive library of J3-Cub photos.

    Access to the J3-Cub.com community is by subscription only. Membership is only $49.99/year or $6.99/month to gain access to this community and extensive unmatched library of knowledge.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member

    You will also get two J3-Cub decals as well!

Federal Requirements

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

bob turner

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
17,075
Reaction score
4,813
Out here, the feds are taking great interest in what goes where near a runway. This one is fairly interesting:

About ten years ago the hold lines for our instrument runway were fairly close to the edge of the runway. Somebody decided that they needed to be very far away from the edge of the runway, so they were all moved to lots closer to the parallel runway. We actually lost a runup spot at the departure end.

So now the hold lines for the instrument runway are so far away from the runway that about one pilot every fifteen minutes or so holds short of them, thinking that they are hold bars for the smaller parallel runway.

The federales now are alert to this problem. The fix apparently is to make all taxiways perpendicular to the runway - no more high speed turnoffs. Picture - if the turnoff is at a 45 degree angle, you have to taxi 1.4 x further to get to the hold line, and presumably the feds are now aware of that. So to make sure you cross the hold line, they figure since it will be closer on a perpendicular turnoff you will more easily figure it out.

Nobody remembers how easy it was before they moved the hold lines so far away from the runway.

This is the same group of non- aviators that thinks 124 feet is required in hangar areas to safely taxi a light plane. One wonders how they drive on a freeway.

By the way, they will not allow a wind sock at the approach end of our runways. Somebody might hit it, I guess.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top